ENA sits at an inflection point. Trading around $0.46, the Ethena token is simultaneously positioned as Q4’s biggest altcoin opportunity and one of crypto’s most dangerous bombs waiting to detonate.
Ethena emerged as one of 2025’s breakout narratives: a synthetic dollar protocol that created USDe, a stablecoin alternative to USDT/USDC. At its peak, USDe reached $3B+ in supply. ENA tokens were airdropped to users who supported the protocol, creating genuine community ownership.
But in October 2025, the entire thesis cracked. Multiple analysts are calling ENA either headed to $1.30+ (180% upside) or potentially collapsing to $0.30 (35% downside). The massive range reflects genuine uncertainty about Ethena’s long-term viability.
Let’s break down what’s really happening with ENA and why traders on MEXC should pay attention.
1.The Ethena Thesis: Synthetic Dollar Without Traditional Reserves
Ethena created something genuinely novel: USDe, a stablecoin not backed by dollar reserves but by a combination of:
Mechanism:
- Long spot ETH position
- Short ETH perp futures
- ETH staking yield capture
Result: Synthetic exposure to the US dollar without needing actual USD reserves.
The appeal: Innovative protocol doesn’t require massive traditional collateral. More efficient capital structure than USDC/USDT.
The risk: Relies on perpetual futures markets staying liquid and balanced. If futures liquidity evaporates or basis collapses, the entire mechanism breaks.
USDe grew to $3B+ supply by mid-2025, attracting yield farmers and DeFi participants seeking non-traditional stablecoin exposure.
2.The October Depeg Scare: When USDe Traded $0.98
In early October 2025, USDe briefly depegged to $0.98, trading 2% below its $1.00 target. The moment sparked panic:
What happened:
Market stress event triggered liquidations across crypto derivatives markets (similar to October 10 flash crash dynamics).
Basis collapse – The ETH perp funding rates inverted, making it expensive to maintain ENA’s hedging mechanism.
Liquidity concerns – With $3B+ USDe in circulation, questions emerged about whether the protocol could maintain the peg during sustained stress.
Sentiment shift: From “innovative alternative” to “untested under pressure”
The recovery:
USDe recovered to peg within hours as:
- Funding rates normalized
- Traders arbitraged the discount
- Ethena implemented mitigations
But the damage was psychological. Confidence eroded. If USDe can’t maintain peg during moderate volatility, what happens during real stress?
3.ENA Token Split: Why Fundamentals and Sentiment Diverged
Here’s where it gets complex. ENA and USDe are different assets with different risk profiles:
USDe (the stablecoin):
- Should trade at $1.00
- Depeg risk if mechanism fails
- Counterparty risk on Ethena protocol
ENA (the governance token):
- Captures protocol value/revenue
- Governance rights over mechanism
- Exposed to Ethena’s success or failure
The disconnect:
USDe depegging to $0.98 shouldn’t directly crash ENA. But it did—because investors lost confidence in the entire Ethena thesis. If the stablecoin mechanism is fragile, the governance token is worthless.
Current sentiment split:
Bullish analysts: ENA dropped 50%+ from peak due to panic, fundamental value remains. Recovery target: $1.30+
Bearish analysts: USDe depeg revealed fatal flaw. Protocol will lose TVL gradually. Fair value: $0.20-0.30
The truth: Depends entirely on whether USDe’s depeg was temporary stress or structural problem.
4.The TVL Concern: Capital Flight
The real danger signal isn’t the peg itself—it’s whether users withdraw USDe and stop using the protocol.
Pre-depeg: USDe supply at $3B+, showing strong adoption
Post-depeg: Early signs of stablecoin outflows as risk-averse users move to USDC
If TVL collapses from $3B to $500M, ENA becomes a protocol managing minimal capital—hardly worth billions in market cap.
Monitoring metrics:
- USDe daily supply changes
- ETH staking yield sustainability
- Perpetual futures basis stability
- Protocol revenue/fees
If any of these deteriorate, ENA has downside. If all remain stable, recovery is likely.
5.Q4 2025 Scenarios
Bullish (40% probability):
USDe stabilizes post-October. Users realize depeg was temporary market stress. TVL stabilizes, protocol becomes major stablecoin alternative. ENA recovers to $0.80-1.30 by year-end.
Catalysts: ETH strength, funding rate normalization, institutional stablecoin demand
Neutral (35% probability):
ENA consolidates $0.40-0.60 range. TVL stays flat but stable. Protocol survives but doesn’t thrive. Modest recovery to $0.60-0.80 by year-end.
Bearish (25% probability):
USDe continues bleeding TVL as users prefer traditional stablecoins. Protocol becomes irrelevant. ENA collapses to $0.20-0.30 by year-end.
Catalysts: Continued stablecoin outflows, macro volatility, competing synthetic protocols
6.Trading ENA on MEXC
ENA likely has deep MEXC liquidity given the token’s prominence in 2025. Here’s how to approach it:
Conservative approach:
Wait for USDe TVL to stabilize and remain stable for 2+ weeks. Monitor on-chain metrics for genuine recovery, not just price bounce.
Entry: Limit orders at $0.35-0.40 (assuming continued weakness). Use tight stops at -20% to cap losses.
Exit: Take profits at $0.65-0.75 (modest gains) rather than waiting for $1.30 recovery.
Moderate approach:
Dollar-cost average position starting at $0.46 with planned entries at $0.40, $0.35, $0.30. Build position over 4-6 weeks as fundamentals clarify.
Target exits: 50% at $0.70, 25% at $0.90, 25% at $1.20+
Aggressive approach:
Accumulate aggressively if you believe Ethena’s synthetic stablecoin thesis is valid and October was washout. Price target $1.50+ by Q1 2026.
Risk management: Maximum 10% portfolio allocation, tight stops at -25%.
7.The Bigger Picture: Synthetic Stablecoins in Q4
ENA’s fate matters beyond Ethena. The entire category of synthetic stablecoins is on trial:
If ENA succeeds: Expect copycat projects and institutional interest in non-reserve-backed stablecoins
If ENA fails: Traditional stablecoins (USDC, USDT) cement dominance, synthetic alternatives fade
The October depeg was a stress test. Ethena either passed or failed that test—and Q4 will reveal which.
8.The Bottom Line: High Risk, High Reward
ENA at $0.46 is neither a steal nor a trap. It’s genuinely uncertain.
The case for ENA:
- Innovative protocol addressing real problem (reserve efficiency)
- Survived October test (barely)
- Team responding with mitigations
- Bullish case: $1.30+ by year-end
The case against ENA:
- Depeg revealed fragility
- TVL starting to decline
- Synthetic mechanism untested long-term
- Bearish case: $0.20-0.30 by year-end
MEXC will provide optimal infrastructure for trading ENA with deep liquidity, low fees, and advanced risk management tools. But the fundamental question—does Ethena’s synthetic stablecoin survive?—is one only the market can answer.
Watch October TVL trends closely. They’ll determine whether ENA is recovering or collapsing.
Disclaimer: This content is for educational and reference purposes only and does not constitute any investment advice. Digital asset investments carry high risk. Please evaluate carefully and assume full responsibility for your own decisions.
Join MEXC and Get up to $10,000 Bonus!
